Guterman who disclosed the news on Twitter, noted FBI’s refusal to confirm or deny the existence of files on third-party individuals, citing an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

Recall Guterman, a staunch supporter of Labour Party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, had previously requested the release of records regarding Tinubu’s $460,000 forfeiture in the United States related to drug trafficking.

But, the FBI responded that his request submission did not meet their terms of service.

In a tweet, Guterman stated,
“See below a copy of the letter I received today from the @FBI regarding my request, based on the Freedom of Information Act, for the FBI file on Bola Tinubu.

“My request was rejected because, according to the FBI, the existence of files on third-party individuals will neither be confirmed nor denied by the FBI due to unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

“I found it noteworthy that in my online submission, I referred to Tinubu as “Bola Tinubu,” but in their letter, the FBI referred to him as TINUBU, BOLA AHMED. How would the FBI access the Ahmed part of his name? Again, I did not provide the Ahmed part of his name in my submission. Moreover, it is public knowledge that the FBI has a file on Tinubu for his $460,000 forfeiture to the US.

“The letter also states that if I received their response through standard mail (which I did), this is because my online submission did not meet their terms of service. According to the letter, my options are to (1) submit any questions by email or call their office, (2) administratively appeal their decision within 90 days of the date of their letter, and/or (3) seek dispute resolution by email.

“I will now consider my next plan of action.”